Raj Dhonota

Episode 11. Developing and opening a new fast food outlet and pitching it to industry experts. Jim Eastwood was team leader for Venture. Helen Louise Milligan was project leader for Logic. Logic Win. Natasha Scribbins is fired.

I hate to say I told you do but…I did! A few blogs ago I predicted that the first chance Lord Sugar gets, he is going to fire Natasha. Low and behold, he got his chance to day and took it.

Clearly Lord Sugar can justify his decision anyway he likes because there never seems to be anyone analysing his performance in the boardroom – apart from me perhaps! Today Lord Sugar felt that with Natasha he couldn’t “reconcile some of the things that happened today.” We didn’t get to find out what he meant because there was no further clarification from Lord Sugar. To me it seemed like another one of those vague criticisms to which there was no substance; made only to enable Lord Sugar to say something critical for the sake of the camera in order to fire someone when in truth it probably was not justified.

After firing Natasha, he commented that it was a tough process and if the candidates could not hack this process, it showed him that they were not capable of being his partner. Honestly, it’s not a tough process at all. The only challenge is the continual race against time and I can’t help but feel that this was another firing on the advice of the producers. Perhaps Natasha wasn’t as big a personality for them hence her card being marked early on? You would think that looking at the task, the biggest failure was from the project leader Jim Eastwood who failed (or so it was made to appear) to formulate any kind of strategy or run the numbers to see if their business was a viable one. Had Jim analysed the figures he would have known what quantity he needed to sell every hour, and this would have enabled him to select a better/easier product to make. Focusing on what he needed to sell each hour would also have indicated to him that the process he had in place to produce the food was too slow. But other than a passing criticism, this seemed of no importance to Lord Sugar when deciding who to fire.

When Natasha tried to justify her position by pointing to the fact that she had fulfilled the responsibility she was given, Lord Sugar retorted “ah ah ah you’re all in the same boat. Don’t give me ‘my responsibility’. Everyone was supposed to pipe up to make the team win.” So today Lord Sugar was looking for the “we, we, we” approach; on numerous occasions before we have seen him advise the candidates to forget the team approach, in favour of the individual approach. Karen Brady and Lord Sugar spoke about the impact of the ‘gruelling’ process on the candidates. Personally, I’m not surprised that after so many weeks the candidates are looking bewildered; but I think it perhaps has more to do with the fact they don’t know what’s coming next from Lord Sugar, than any task they are being asked to perform!

In this episode we also saw another side to Karen. Her psychic side! In the boardroom she stated that Susan had pointed out how to improve the process in the kitchen. However, Karen was not even in the car when Susan suggested it! Clearly, she must psychic powers to have known this; unless of course, it proves my point that it’s the producers who provide the main feedback to Lord Sugar! I’ll let you decide.

Episode 10. Buying merchandise at wholesale prices. Selling it. Reinvesting in further stock. As lord Sugar put it, smell what you can sell. The team with highest combined value of sales and surplus stock win. Melody Hossaini was project manager for Logic, Natasha Scribbins project manager for Venture. Venture win. Melody Hossaini, Helen Milligan and Tom Pellereau end up in the boardroom. Melody Hossaini is fired.

To start with, it did make me laugh when Lord Sugar confronted Susan about her feeling that he had supplied the candidates with, in his words, “a load of tut”. I remember thinking the same once!

In the boardroom we saw Lord Sugar criticise Helen for never having been self employed, telling her that “you don’t just spring out of bed one Monday morning and say ooh I fancy starting a business….you have to have an idea and more to the point you have to have experience.” For sure you need an idea, and I’m glad Lord Sugar cleared that one up for us! However, I thought it was wrong of Lord Sugar to assume that just because someone has been employed their whole career, they either do not have the ability or know-how to start a business. I also disagree that having experience is a must have. Yes experience would be advantageous, but there are plenty of businesses like my company Life’s Dream, that help and support people without experience to start their own business. In fact, because Life’s Dream gives people the opportunity to start their own business part time or around existing commitments and without the need for any kind of investment, most of our enquiries come from people who have been employed their whole career. And if anything, this proves to be an advantage because their desire and willingness to build their knowledge makes them extremely receptive to the training we provide to bridge any experience gap. Franchises are another example where people are able to start their own business with the help and support of the Franchisor to bridge any lack of experience or knowledge. So in short, yes experience is useful, but not having any is not really a hindrance if you have the right support structure available to you.

Finally, we get to the firing. Despite Lord Sugar repeatedly telling Tom that were he to appear in the boardroom again he would be fired, that there would be no more chances, Tom escapes and Melody is fired. Hmmm? Ditto everything I have said before about the lack of consistency in the boardroom…